The Unreliable Narrator as Liar v. Unreliable
Narrator as Guide
Whenever I think of the concept of the "unreliable narrator" in literature,
I think of Edgar Allan Poe, and stories of his like the "Tell-Tale Heart,"
"The Black Cat," and "The Fall of the House of Usher." Using
Poe's fiction as a type of manual, my teachers in graduate school taught me
how to interrogate a narrator's credibility; I was taught, in essence, to read
against the narrative, to look for signs of contradiction, to chart
the extremes of obsession, to diagnose mental illness. The typical Poe narrator
strategically and rationally tells his story—at least seemingly, or professedly,
so at the start. But in focusing on his "reality," his guilt, the
perfection of his crime, the intensity of his experience, and so on, he pulls
us into a monomania that has afflicted him and distorts his vision; his tale
blurs the line between sanity and insanity, and leaves its readers with questions,
possibilities, and disturbances.
This is a preview of
Truth, Lies, and Good Form in Novels: Reading Response to The Things They Carried.
Read the full post (3085 words)