Young Adult Literature Rubric

English Education Rubric 10: “Young Adult Literature” Commentary on a STUDENT-CREATED ARTIFACT in an English Course

 

 

Exceeds

Meets Emerging Not Evident Score
  3 2 1

0

10.1 The commentary summarizes the artifact for the analytical purposes of the commentary with clarity, succinctness, and thoroughness. The commentary summarizes the artifact sufficiently for the analytical purposes of the commentary. The commentary summarizes the artifact but not fully enough for the analytical purposes of the commentary. The commentary does not summarize the artifact for the analytical purposes of the commentary.
10.2 The commentary provides a clear explanation of how the artifact does or does not address issues of Young Adult literature, as well as contextualizing the artifact in a theoretical tradition. The commentary provides a clear explanation of how the artifact does or does not address an issue (or issues) of Young Adult literature. The commentary explains how the artifact does or does not address an issue (or issues) of Young Adult literature in a largely correct fashion, though the artifact analysis may be lacking in depth or thoroughness. The commentary shows little understanding of the artifact and how the artifact might address issues of Young Adult literature.
10.3 The commentary provides a valid overview discussion, with researched information, on the role of Young Adult literature in English studies. The commentary provides a valid overview discussion on the role of Young Adult literature in English studies. The commentary shows some awareness of Young Adult literature in English studies, though this awareness is not yet formulated completely. The commentary fails to show an awareness of the role of Young Adult literature in English studies.
10.4 The style and substance of the commentary approach the standards of publishable scholarship. The commentary exemplifies the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical/linguistic commentary. The commentary shows incipient understanding of the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical/linguistic commentary The commentary shows little to no understanding of the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical/linguistic commentary
Total: