English Education Rubric 4: Issues of Historical Context Commentary on a STUDENT-CREATED ARTIFACT in an English Course
|
Exceeds |
Meets | Emerging | Not Evident | Score | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
0 |
||
| 4.1 |
The commentary summarizes the artifact for the analytical purposes of the commentary with clarity, succinctness, and thoroughness. |
The commentary summarizes the artifact sufficiently for the analytical purposes of the commentary. | The commentary summarizes the artifact but not fully enough for the analytical purposes of the commentary. | The commentary does not summarize the artifact for the analytical purposes of the commentary. | |
| 4.2 | The commentary provides a clear explanation of how the artifact does or does not address issues of historicity as relevant to English studies, as well as contextualizing the artifact in a theoretical tradition. | The commentary provides a clear explanation of how the artifact does or does not address issues of historicity as relevant to English studies. | The commentary explains how the artifact does or does not address issues of historicity as relevant to English studies in a largely correct fashion, though the artifact analysis may be lacking in depth or thoroughness. | The commentary shows little understanding of the artifact and how the artifact might address issues of historicity as relevant to English studies. | |
| 4.3 | The commentary presents a concept of historicity that is relevant to the artifact and makes connections to or engages a broader conceptualization of historicity pertinent to English studies. | The commentary provides an implicit or explicit definition of the role of historicity in English studies. | The commentary shows some awareness of historicity as a concept in English studies, though this awareness is not yet formulated in terms of an explicit or implicit definition. | The commentary fails to show awareness of historicity as a concept in English studies. | |
| 4.4 | The style and substance of the commentary approach the standards of publishable scholarship. | The commentary exemplifies the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical commentary. | The commentary shows incipient understanding of the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical commentary |
The commentary shows little to no understanding of the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical commentary |
|
|
Total: |
|||||