| Teaching
Metaphor: Teaching is a Taco It starts with a shell. Every teacher starts with the basics: a love for the subject matter, a desire to reach out, a passion for a particular age group, and usually (hopefully!) a skill with people. For some, we think that this is all it takes. The more time we spend with students and other teachers, the more we see that these elements are just the beginning of what is needed to succeed in this career. The types of shells are the types of teachers... we might want to be the one who teaches 6 year olds how to read (corn?). We might want to be the P.E. teacher who helps students become physically healthy and strong (hard shell?). We might be the one who loves a subject matter so much we want to pass it on. I will consider the third example the flour tortilla shell... and that one is my favorite, where I want to be.
Beef, chicken, pork, fish, beans... there
has to be some protein. |
|
| I
was recently challenged with the importance of teaching Harper Lee's To
Kill a Mockingbird to ninth graders. Why is it a significant text? What
are we hoping students gain from reading it? Although I believed in the
validity of the book, I didn't know how to answer these questions at first.
This prompted me to research the book and take a closer look at its content.
In the end, I was able to say that TKaM is important because it
presents complex issues through the eyes of a child, it shows how just one
person can make a difference in another's life, it presents an important
snapshot of racial and class relations in the southern United States during
the Depression era, and it shows that no matter how hard we try, our efforts
cannot always positively impact a situation. Teaching TKaM in our
modern classroom is a wonderful springboard for showing how these social
relations have changed - and stayed the same - since the 1930s. Regardless of whether my assessments of that particular text are agreeable or not, the process is the important thing. Teachers must dive into their subject matter and come up with something richer, deeper, filling. An shell with a few fixings is a superficial education. One overflowing with something substantive is what we should offer students, and by doing this, we must be constantly simmering... basting in the juices of our learning, bulking up what we know so that we have more to give. Cheese makes it taste better/go down more
smoothly. I have encountered teachers who become so frustrated by the parameters under which they must work. Most commonly, when it comes to the strict guidelines of the paragraph, I have heard, "Who writes this way?" What are we to do when faced with such restrictions? (I, who thrives when writing the brief, Hemingway-esque paragraphs, cringe at the thought of mandating an 8-10 sentence style). The best answer I have is to put a little personal spin onto it. Make the boring book fun by acting out the parts. Make the boring paragraph style a little easier by writing about fun things. Turn Shakespeare on its ear by pairing it with differing translations and media. Content changes, but only over time. While we work to introduce new selections into the content, we're going to be stuck working with the old. Case in point: I hate The Scarlet Letter and there is a distinct possibility I will be teaching it. I cannot ever get around the fact that Nathaniel Hawthorne is a celebrated early American author, and that the book I disdain is one of his most significant works. What will I do to make it easier for me, and therefore the class, to digest? Add cheese, maybe some sour cream. What that means at this point is beyond me, but whatever it is, it will make the whole thing tastier and more easily swallowed. Eat your veggies any way you can. Spicing up the lesson is the bulk of what we learn from Nancy Steineke. Keep things unpredictable, give them a pop. This is a lot like the cheese factor above, except that it is more that doing something different every once in awhile... it is about being innovative. that word scares me, because it implies doing something no one has done before, but that assessment is not altogether true. If I employ the methods of Steineke's binders, shoulder partners, or other techniques inside my classroom, than it is going to be innovative in my classroom, to my students. When I have prepared lesson plans in the
past, I rarely have felt like I was doing something innovative. Even the
'creative' projects I tend to employ have already become yesterday's stale
tortilla... webquests, book shares, journals. How will I break from these
new yet still predictable patterns? Again, I know that I don't have all
those answers now, but I have the base: I know that this component is
necessary to a satisfying, worth-talking-about taco. I don't know what my
spices will be. I am pretty excited about the thoughts of injecting a little
fanfiction into studies of prose. I think I will be a pro at tying classic
or academic works into pop culture. But for now, those are just bottled
spices and salsas in a jar. The more experience I have, the more I will
experiment with spicy ingredients all my own. Tacos,
in a word, rock!
We must be a complete package that entices and delivers to our audience.
|
|