English Education Rubric 10: “Young Adult Literature” Commentary on a STUDENT-CREATED ARTIFACT in an English Course
|
Exceeds |
Meets | Emerging | Not Evident | Score | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
0 |
||
| 10.1 | The commentary summarizes the artifact for the analytical purposes of the commentary with clarity, succinctness, and thoroughness. | The commentary summarizes the artifact sufficiently for the analytical purposes of the commentary. | The commentary summarizes the artifact but not fully enough for the analytical purposes of the commentary. | The commentary does not summarize the artifact for the analytical purposes of the commentary. | |
| 10.2 | The commentary provides a clear explanation of how the artifact does or does not address issues of Young Adult literature, as well as contextualizing the artifact in a theoretical tradition. | The commentary provides a clear explanation of how the artifact does or does not address an issue (or issues) of Young Adult literature. | The commentary explains how the artifact does or does not address an issue (or issues) of Young Adult literature in a largely correct fashion, though the artifact analysis may be lacking in depth or thoroughness. | The commentary shows little understanding of the artifact and how the artifact might address issues of Young Adult literature. | |
| 10.3 | The commentary provides a valid overview discussion, with researched information, on the role of Young Adult literature in English studies. | The commentary provides a valid overview discussion on the role of Young Adult literature in English studies. | The commentary shows some awareness of Young Adult literature in English studies, though this awareness is not yet formulated completely. | The commentary fails to show an awareness of the role of Young Adult literature in English studies. | |
| 10.4 | The style and substance of the commentary approach the standards of publishable scholarship. | The commentary exemplifies the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical/linguistic commentary. | The commentary shows incipient understanding of the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical/linguistic commentary | The commentary shows little to no understanding of the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical/linguistic commentary | |
| Total: | |||||