English Education Rubric 9: “Language and Linguistics” Commentary on a STUDENT-CREATED ARTIFACT in an English Course
|
Exceeds |
Meets | Emerging | Not Evident | Score | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
0 |
||
| 9.1 |
The commentary summarizes the artifact for the analytical purposes of the commentary with clarity, succinctness, and thoroughness. |
The commentary summarizes the artifact sufficiently for the analytical purposes of the commentary. | The commentary summarizes the artifact but not fully enough for the analytical purposes of the commentary. | The commentary does not summarize the artifact for the analytical purposes of the commentary. | |
| 9.2 | The commentary provides a clear explanation of how the artifact does or does not address issues of language (as specified on the Language Assignment Sheet), as well as contextualizing the artifact in a theoretical tradition. | The commentary provides a clear explanation of how the artifact does or does not address an issue (or issues) of language (as specified on the Language Assignment Sheet). | The commentary explains how the artifact does or does not address an issue (or issues) of language (as specified on the Language Assignment Sheet) in a largely correct fashion, though the artifact analysis may be lacking in depth or thoroughness. | The commentary shows little understanding of the artifact and how the artifact might address issues of language (as specified on the Language Assignment Sheet). | |
| 9.3 | The commentary provides a valid overview discussion or definition, with researched information, on the role of one of the categories of language (as specified on the Language Assignment Sheet). | The commentary provides a valid overview discussion or definition of the role of one of the categories of language (as specified on the Language Assignment Sheet). | The commentary shows some awareness of one of the categories of language (as specified on the Language Assignment Sheet), though this awareness is not yet formulated completely. | The commentary fails to show an awareness of any of the categories of language (as specified on the Language Assignment Sheet). | |
| 9.4 | The style and substance of the commentary approach the standards of publishable linguistic scholarship. | The commentary exemplifies the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical/linguistic commentary. | The commentary shows incipient understanding of the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical/linguistic commentary | The commentary shows little to no understanding of the discourse conventions of literary/rhetorical/linguistic commentary | |
|
Total: |
|||||